.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Hi. I'm trying to think of another description to put here. Any ideas? I'll try again at 420.

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Dear Meg...

...I am more at fault in the failure of my marriage than I had realized. I think the thing that fascinates men about your blog is a woman's raw perspective on where things go wrong, without being yet another man-basher/hater/whipper. Your stuff is helping me get into my wife's head more than before, which is a scary place for me to be ...

Ah! That’s the first time that anyone has ever explained to me exactly why it is the men read this thing. No, I’m not a man hater...I absolutely LOVE them...I wish I could have 14...two for each day and...well, you get the message.

I am almost as angry about male-bashing than the men are...maybe more so, I don’t know. But I have been annoyed by the tactics of the women’s movement for years now. It seems as though they watched the civil rights movement, a movement that was absolutely necessary...adopted some of their methods and then twisted them into something very ugly. I think a few different “movements” started trying to promote their own causes and that has led us to a point where the movements have become more fascist then any of the original “dictators” ever were. (Except of course for the blacks, they had some serious issues at one time...now their leaders are pretty much like unions. Statutes protecting workers have long ago replaced the need for them so they have to whine about anything and everything to remain a “necessary” entity.)

I am amazed when I hear women saying things like, “We need to have a voice in Hollywood, there are no good roles for women!” Well, when I look back, I see women like Lauren Bacall, Mae West and Greta Garbo...and countless other talented women who made their marks long before any woman ever whined that there were no roles for women.

Think of a field, any field...and then look back at what women have accomplished in those fields. Madam Curie didn’t have to go to an all male school, she studied and experimented and used her own brain power to make her mark. Any woman on the planet can do the same thing, they just have to have the will to do it with. If they don’t like the status quo, they can change it. But it’s ever so much easier to bitch and moan until someone says, “OK, here you go, take this money”.

Jesse Jackson and his ilk are just as bad. If a certain company or entity of ANY kind is in their sites, they negotiate for CASH! Or for something else that does no good for anyone but the organization that uses the strong arm tactics.

And I wanted to puke when the women were allowed into what were once all boy-schools. They COULD have just made schools of their own but they didn’t want to go through the effort. So, now, a young man who wants to study in a structured, all male environment has lost that right. The women always had the right to create their OWN institutions, but they were too lazy for that. Then, I heard about a school in New York that is all female because they did a study and learned that, “For some girls, an all-female environment is conducive to increased test scores.” DUH! They want the right to send their daughters to an all-girl school but call it sexist if the boys want the same thing. What a bunch of losers. These women are such jack-asses, they forget that one day, they may have a son who might want to attend an all boy school and now they have made it impossible for them to do so!

I have brothers, sons, a father and many men friends who are wonderful human beings that have so much to offer to the world. I would be a reckless hypocrite should I get up here or anywhere and speak ill of men while there are so many that I love.

I saw an interview once (it was so long ago that I don’t remember exactly who was involved) and some higher up at NOW was asked how she could support the Kennedy's while they were doing such hideous things to women. (This was about the time that one Kennedy was screwing his babysitter and another was attempting to bastardize his children by getting an annulment from his wife to marry a women who screws married men.) Her answer to that question stunned me. She actually said, (and this is a paraphrase) “We don’t care about their morals or ethics, we just like where they stand on the issues.”

Can you imagine? She didn’t care about MORALS or ETHICS when choosing the people who would lead us all. I imagine these women would elect Hitler himself as long as he supported abortion.

Any woman who “hates” men or tries to usurp things that the men have created themselves is being very shortsighted. When they to attempt to bully their way into men’s institutions or any other male oriented type of thing, they are throwing up their arms and saying, “We are too weak and dim-witted to create one of our own so we want YOURS!”

When they do that, they do a disservice to us all. They strong-arm their way into an organization and then whine that the standards are too high and therefore sexist. The standards are then lowered and everybody loses.

So, I don’t hate men at all. I don’t even dislike them a little tiny bit. As with any other group of people, I take them one by one and base my opinion on the behavior of the one that I am dealing with. Vex is a jerk...not because he’s a man, but because he is simply, a jerk. I am not about to dismiss or slight 49% of the population based upon the actions of one of them. That would be ignorant and bigoted and I am neither.

Oh, and to the women who DO hate men...keep your vitriol to yourself...you don’t speak for me because I don’t agree with ANY of your tenets.

Men are wonderful people, they care for us, they support us and they even really, really like us. Whatever affront you may have felt is a personal problem. Don’t even attempt to speak for me...I can do it myself. And if I want something, I’ll go out and work for it, just like the men did. If you are too inferior to create your own schools and golf courses, try a few push-ups. In the meantime, leave the men alone and stop acting like victims.

OK, that was my soap box speech for the day....I have to go get dressed (yeah, I slept too late AGAIN!) and feed my dog.

See ya,

Meg

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Women also complain of no role models for their daughters. Who was the role model for Amelia Earheart? For Charlotte Bronte? For Harriet Tubman? For Elizabeth I????

June 21, 2005  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

Exactly!!!!

Any one of us, male or female, can do whatever we want to do or attain anything we want to attain, we just have to want it badly enough. If these women COULD do anything on their own, they would be busy doing it, not trying to take over what was created by somebody elses blood sweat and tears.

Meg

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who did Tonya Harding have to look up to? Or Karla Homolka?

Sometimes you just have to blaze your own trail.

June 21, 2005  
Blogger Anne Arky said...

You are right about a lot of things in this soapboxing. I think all too often the original reason for the organization gets lost in a "my side versus your side" loyalty thing. I was in a chat room talking to a young African-American woman one night (I am Euro-American) and she said that if anyone at her job gets into an argument, she automatically takes the side of the black person against the white person, whether she agrees with them or not, because "I'm proud of my race" or some such drivel. I replied, "When we do that, it's called 'bigotry'. What's it called when you all do it?"

Anne

June 21, 2005  
Blogger Anne Arky said...

Awesomely Great 20th Century Role Models

1. Helen Keller
2. Anne Sullivan (Helen Keller's teacher)
3. Eleanor Roosevelt
4. Rosa Parks
5. Babe Didrickson

Please note: All of the above were known for most of their famous achievements BEFORE 1950.

- Anne

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree whole-heartedly. Part of the trouble I think is, the former generation spent their time fighting for those rights... now... this generation doesn't know what to do with them, so it's easier to keep screaming "Oppression" and to keep rolling forward like some giant tank, than to realize that now that we have those rights... we also have the responsibilities that come with them.

It is my belief that the women's movement began in an effort to fight double standards. Now it upholds the ones that suit it's agenda.

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another thought... I think women's biggest problem (and perhaps men's too) is that with the competitve nature of capitalixm in our country, there is little if anything left at all of a sense of community... which I believe is greatly contributing to higher statistics of depression and other mental illnesses. Do I have research to back that claim... no... but I'm working on it!

June 21, 2005  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

Labona,

I'll let anyone who wants to go to your site do so and answer that question. Personally, I prefer to keep my political opinions to myself. I don't judge others, I wasn't appointed the job.

So, folks, if you care to, go to that person's site and tell them what you think of abortion or any other subject that you care to comment on.

Meg

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not so much capitalism itself.. as the attitude that we start applying to areas of our life where it doesn't belong. I don't believe in socialism, and I believe that ideally capitalism can work. I have noticed (to give a specific example) that the competititive attitude that we have to have for capitalism (which I think overall is good as it usually breeds an improving economy and better ideas) has been applied towards parenthood. Now instead of supporting each other, parents are screaming that their method is best and that anyone else who doesn't follow their method is damaging or abusing their child. I'm not in any way trying to blame capitalism per se, just that we're allowing that sort of competition to bleed into social aspects that it doesn't belong in.

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If I could finish a thought without hitting publish it would be a miracle. The point I was trying to come to is that we are constantly competing instead of communing in areas that it doesn't make sense. That's all.

June 21, 2005  
Blogger Karen said...

I *HOWLED* at your fart story!!! (Blogger wouldn't let me comment in it, for some reason.)

Root Beer's farting is caused almost entirely by giving him people-food. If you don't spoil your dog like that, maybe try switching dog food brands.

It's so funny - I can tell which farts are Root Beers and which aren't!

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Guy I actually completely agree with you, and I never really meant to cite capitalism as the cause... I suppose the attitude it breeds is one contributing factor.

I agree with your points on the "feel good" society. Most adults now have a sense that they are entitled to always feel good, and thence comes in keeping up with the Jones'.

I also agree with auntie... Women fought for the right to be able to choose whether or not to work... now it's almost a necessity. And career driven competitive parent try to buy their children off with toys, and a full time nanny.

June 21, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Meg, I wrote to you as directed (I think you meant me, I wrote the JUMP poem) but you might have deleted because my email contains "india" in the from field and you might have thought I was the person who writes poorly here. (The one who talks about "free of speach" or whatever)I am not Indian or in India, it's just that my user name refers to lyrics from Alanis. Sorry for any confusion.

June 22, 2005  
Blogger Anne Arky said...

I sit corrected -- Rosa Parks took her civil rights stance in 1955, rather than before 1950.

Anne

June 22, 2005  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

Yeah, but I bet she was annoyed before 1950!
She certainly had become the strong woman that she is known to us all as.

Meg

June 22, 2005  

Post a Comment

<< Home