Edward Walkwitz Teaches SOMEBODIES kids!!!
Ick, ick, ick...
...no wonder he spends so much time trolling in his perverted fashion about 3 year old boys...women aren't going to be swayed by THIS puss:
MSG Tripps
I trolled old Meg back then.
It seems she went to high school when and where my father was head of the science department. I was able to freak her out with information about her school and town for a number of posts. Of course she quickly deleted them and banned me.
I got her one more time when she posts pictures of her grandson on the commode. I trolled her about child pornography until she removed the images.
That's an admission, even a bragging admission that this is the pervert who took sweet pictures of my grandson and viewed them as sexual entities. Remember his name in case he lives near you and your children. Also, make a mental note that he is a teacher...check your children's schedule for the name Edward Walkwitz and if you find it there, call the school and let them know about his admission of sexual harassment...his word is "trolled"...see definitions below.
Oh, and he's a liar as well. I don't even know how to ban people. Has ANYONE out there been personally "banned" from this blog? Ever? In all the years I've had it, I've never banned anyone. If I could I would have banned my ex husband's idiot wife Deana years ago. What a clown.
TROLLING: Being a prick on the internet because you can. Typically unleashing one or more cynical or sarcastic remarks on an innocent by-stander, because it's the internet and, hey, you can.
Act of appearing on internet forums and boards with malicious intent. Trolling includes...
-batting people to flame at you
-putting the forum down and encouraging people to leave.
-flaming
-spamming
-using several identities on a board to support your own arguments / stage pretend arguments
-generally being a dick on a power trip.
Some trolls claim they actions benefit others. These trolls are also twats.
To use the internet to start problems, insult, or hurt others. An action that only usually affects the person trolling.
Usually a very bored, lonely person with no friends. Or a punk ass kid.
To make inflammatory comments on the internet for the purpose of starting controversy and gauging people's reactions.
What idiots say they were doing when they make an uneducated remark that is quickly discredited.
(www.urbandictionary.com)
4 in Bensenville, IL
1 in Dallas, TX
1 in Marietta, GA
See all cities
Aliases
Edward R Walkwitz
Edward Walkwitz
Ed Walkwitz
As I mind my own business and check the referrals on the blog, I see that I'm getting a shitload from here:
http://high-street.org/viewtopic.php?id=10648
Talk about obsessing.
A semi-reasonable person wrote:
Oh, and Ptah:
There is Meg Kelso material available here:
http://diaryofmydivorce.blogspot.com/
This may or may not be OUR Meg Kelso. The "Diary of My Divorce" blog was a CSOTD at one point, then a poster called Meg Kelso showed up at Cruel. I have never been able to make up my mind if the blog's Meg was also Cruel's Meg; if you will read some of the blog, you'll see that there is a disclaimer to the effect that someone jacked her name and caused all the itshay at Cruel. On the other hand, read some of the lady's other material, and you have to wonder...
The blog is searchable, just search on "Cruel" and you'll find pertinent stuff.
Then, another yahoo who likes to brag that he knows me wrote this:
That is indeed Ms. Meg. I have invited her over!
Have I shown up yet you loser?
These are the same nimrods who accuse me of "obsessing" about my ex because I mentioned him in a post. After decades with the fool, I couldn't leave him out of MANY stories...could I? They, on the other hand, have no reason at all to keep obsessing over this blog, they could leave and never come back.
They are the laughing stock of me.
Here's more of the fun they've been having at my grandson's expense:
MSG Tripps wrote:
Meg and her collection of kiddie scat porn.
G...bomm!Meg Kelso Kiddie Scat Spectacular Kiddie Porn with Meg KelsoMeg Kelso presents naked 3 year olds3 year old shitting erotica by Meg KelsoMeg Kelso's Underage Scat GalleryClick 'em all and click 'em often!
Offline
#14 2008-05-31 11:29:45
MSG Tripps
Hey opsec, this [Meg Kelso Presents Kiddie Porn] may be for you.Right.
MSG Tripps
What do ya'll know about vaporizers?
I am thinking of trading my bong in.
http://high-street.org/viewtopic.php?id=10668 He states that "Creationism is a bankrupt philosophy." Yeah...we want this freak teaching our kids.
I wonder how many Michael Jackson fans Walkwitz and his friends teach:
http://high-street.org/viewtopic.php?id=10213&p=1
How many gay kids does he teach?
MSG Tripps
I'm so glaad.I'm glaad, I'm glaad, I'm glaad.[sic] HBO is 42% gay.
http://high-street.org/viewtopic.php?id=10618
OMG...tell me this guy and his cabal AREN'T racist:
http://high-street.org/viewtopic.php?id=10498
http://high-street.org/viewtopic.php?id=10501
Man...this guy is a freak...I'm bored with his freakiness, here it is:
http://high-street.org/search.php?search_id=1705654515
This from a teacher?
MSG Tripps wrote:
You are a miserable fuckhead. Go crawl under something and die.
I don't think so, fucktard.I am not the one spewing some kind of shit around here.So....Kiss my ass motherfucker.
Mispelling Bensenville is a nice... but desperate touch.
MSG Tripps
It looks as if Ed is not dead.
The Bensonville Whore wrote:
Edward Walkwitz0000 XXXXX StXXXXXXX, XX 00000-0000(000) 000-0000Household:XXXXXXXX Walkwitz (married to the perv)[sic]
Wonder what the old boy will do when he finds out about the twats slander?
posted by Meg Kelso | 8:28 AM
17 Comments:
LMAO...you know where I am!
Number of Entries:
Entry Page Time:
Visit Length:
Browser
OS
Resolution 17
4th August 2009 07:29:04
10 hours 9 mins 43 secs
Firefox 3.5.2
Windows Vista
1280x1024 Returning Visits:
Location:
Hostname:
Entry Page:
Exit Page:
Referring URL: 0
loading...
resolving... (71.194.163.46) Walkwitz [Edit Label]
diaryofmydivorce.blogspot.com/
diaryofmydivorce.blogspot.com/
high-street.org/viewtopic.php?pid=106204
How is creationism NOT a bankrupt philosophy? There's no evidence to support it, and REAMS of evidence to support evolution...
My point was not to argue creationism vs. evolution. It was to show the blatant disrespect that some people have for the beliefs of others. Answer this question if you can...why would Ed Walkwitz have even SAID that? Was it simply to make other people feel stupid or angry? What possible good could come of making that statement? There's no way that it could be for anything other than satisfying his "trolling" obsession.
Meg is so right. You guys are acting like internet thugs
Meg is guilty of stalking one of our members in real life; if you want to talk about thugs, discuss that subject with her.
Why should I have to respect a belief that is blatantly factually incorrect?
What club do you belong to? I'd like to hear the evidence against Meg. You forget that we know her well. She would never waste her time with you fools.
You don't have to respect any thought. But you should respect another's right to think what they want to think. This is America after all.
Of course people can think what they want to think, and, when those thoughts are crazy and wrong, we're free to criticize them. Freedom of speech cuts both ways.
Of course it does. Chilax dude, it's all good.
:)
I didn't change my mind. I accomplished what I set out to accomplish and I showed anyone who was paying attention that you're a schmuck...to your computer screen people may high five you...but trust me...they are ALL glad to watch you wiggle a bit.
Me too only now I'm bored of it so go away and troll your own cave.
Tell Pops I said "Hello!"
When was that dufus head of any science department? Have you been acting all Italian and puffing up your own deflated image? Pity.
You’re starting to squirm Meg. You thought the kiddy porn and stalking episodes were behind you, but they are coming back to haunt you. So what are you going to say to your grandson when he’s older if he becomes aware that perverts are masturbating to pictures of him that you posted on the web?
Meg, you are the internet thug here. Anyone with any sense would absolutely not post pictures of naked children on a public page - those pictures will be a terrible source of embarrassment for that kid. You will enjoy making him feel bad and probably tell him it's "cute" and he should "get over it." That's bullying, you psycho harpy.
You also believe that your imaginary friend is omnipotent and that I should cater to your insanity by providing your religion tax-free status & allowing nuts like you to dumb down our educational system. Don't make fun of athiests when you can't take the same treatment.
Your ovaries must be filled with old fishing tackle and fragments of snow baby figurines.
I AM an athiest but I also have respect for those who aren't and I get no thrill out of disrespecting them.
Whatever.
OK...I'll post your speech out of respect for your freedom...but I'm taking out the names...out of respect for my friends:
Why not post what I said - about your picking fights with other bloggers in the past
*&, (*$$^%#*&^, #*@!#*^, %^$#, &^$#, etc, etc etc,
you disregard these comments, because you can. So much for your freedom of speech
But make no mistake...I disregard ALL of the comments you nit wits post...not just the ones with my friend's names in them. And yes, because I can. You guys should learn to do the same.
Post a Comment
<< Home