.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Hi. I'm trying to think of another description to put here. Any ideas? I'll try again at 420.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Is it me...

...or is Nancy Grace an utter and complete whack job? The Maury Povich of cable’s prime time talking heads, CNN’s helmet headed and confused crusader against all perceived evil people and their families, Grace is as rude as she is stupid.

Thanks to a poorly thought out decision to change from cable TV to satellite TV, I admit to finding myself watching that train wreck just long enough to become embarrassed for the woman herself and for the guests whom she abuses. It’s tough to make me uncomfortable in my own home, especially if you’re nowhere near my place. But somehow Nancy Grace did just that.

They do call the people who appear on shows “guests”, don’t they? That would sort of make Grace the hostess, wouldn’t it? Well, that lady needs some serious Amy Vanderbilt books and maybe even a copy of Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People.

You would think that the first time she saw herself ask a question, totally misinterpret the answer and bash someone for something that they didn’t say, she would be careful not to do it again. Or, you would think that if she was daft enough to miss her own idiocy, perhaps her staff might point it out. But they don’t. I’m sure it’s because they love to see her look like a buffoon.

I have no problem with the fact that she soaks every missing child for every single rating and tear that she can. After all, she does keep the pictures and details out there and that’s a good thing. But her attitude gives away her true intent. She has all the sincerity of Dog The Bounty Hunter, all the charm of Judge Judy and all the brains of Jimmy Carter. But the Dog, the Judge and the ex-President all have the ability to comprehend the speech of others. They have to…Dog so that he can arrest them, Judy so that she can attack them and Carter so that he can stick his nose where it doesn't belong.

In case you’ve been lucky enough to have avoided the pit bull of a dog with a chicken bone, this is an example of how she treats those who dare to step into one of those tiny squares on her show:

Grace: What can you tell me about the blood on her shirt?
Guest: There’s no way to know until the test results come in but it’s possible that she was hit in the mouth during the struggle and that it’s her own blood.
Grace: Oh, oh, oh…are you saying what I think you’re saying? Do you actually believe that her own blood could possibly drip from her mouth during a struggle?! I’m just an attorney, what do I know…Dr. Soinso, weigh in please.
Dr. Soinso: Your other guest was right, we need to wait for the test results to know anything conclusive.
Grace: Oh my Lord! Am I the only one left with a brain cell here?!

I could almost understand Grace’s cult following…if she weren’t so incredibly consistent with her misunderstandings of the people whom she invites on to her show. Why they keep coming, I haven’t a clue. After the show, I can picture her walking away mumbling to herself, “I don’t know why they make me have guests, everyone but me is a MORON!”

Her show is just that, a show…and she is a showman. But who in the world wants to watch a show about a goofy looking stupid chick who invites people over every night to make them look foolish? I don’t get it.

After my stint on that Judge Pirro Show, I realized how much of those shows are staged. That experience sort of busted my reality TV cherry. Now I see how producers manipulate people and situations for ratings. I guess I always knew that they did that but until Pirro made ME look foolish for helping out a family member, I didn’t realize how pliable the audience was.

Grace may be an ignorant blond nit wit but she does recognize the pliability of most TV viewers. And just in case the viewer feels the slightest pang of empathy for someone like George and Cindy Anthony, who’s only crime is trusting and coddling a lying, manipulative daughter, Grace will do her best to wipe that affinity out of any heart that she can.

The Caylee Anthony story is a sad one, indeed. And I’m sure that if the Anthony’s had anything to do with their granddaughter’s disappearance, we would know it by now. Everything else in the story has been leaked by the prosecution.

The cops leaked the tapes of visits between the Anthony’s and their daughter. What POSSIBLE reason could they have for doing that? And when they did, Grace showed the same tapes over and over again and dissected every single sentence that was said. And then, when the family stopped giving her fodder for her show, she berated them publicly for not “consoling” their daughter in front of the cameras.

Grace reminds me of Bernie Mac’s character in Guess Who where he accuses Aston Kutcher’s character of racism when he doesn’t “trust” a hotel bellboy with his luggage. Then, when Kutcher asks the bellboy for help, Mac says, “Oh sure, treat him like your personal slave!” There was nothing that Kutcher’s character could have done to please Mac’s character and there’s not a damn thing that those poor grandparents can do to avoid Grace’s wrath.

I have a beautiful little granddaughter myself and I simply cannot imagine what those people must be going through. I also have imperfect children whom I love desperately.

Many parents feel the pain of raising a child only to see that child go to prison for decades. That in itself would be a heart-breaker. Many other parents and grandparents lose children. The pain of that is too hideous to even contemplate. The pain and emotional trauma that goes along with experiencing both events must be exponentially more acute.

I’ll agree that the Anthony’s raised their daughter in an enabling manner. She learned to be such a narcissistic monster somewhere. And perhaps they even continue to enable her. But they are the only people being deceived by Casey. The authorities, who are the only people who matter anyway, aren’t fooled by her at all. Let her parents grieve and deal with this dreadful situation on their own timetable. Not much can be hurt by allowing them that small concession, even Nancy Grace could still bitch, she should just keep her bitchiness aimed at the appropriate target.

If I could ask one question of Ms. Grace, it would be this, “What can the Anthony’s do that would make you happy?” I think already know the answer to that question.

I bet you a dollar to a donut that if Nancy Grace had been here 2000 years ago, she would be in charge of stoning social lepers of any and all types. If the Anthony’s refuse to throw a huge stone or two at their own daughter, Grace won’t let up on them…ever. I’m sure that it was someone with just her personality type who thought up games for the masses to watch in the Coliseum when condemned prisoners were sent to their deaths in various painful manners.

I don’t for a moment mean to suggest that the victims of Grace’s wrath don’t deserve some degree of uncomfortable retribution for their acts, most of them are pretty hideous people and perhaps the entire Anthony family are all hideous people. But I do question the earnest manner in which Nancy Grace assumes responsibility for chastising all who stand accused of a crime and even many who do not. Her methods and her misplaced tenacity only stand to suggest that being tried in the “courtroom of Nancy Grace” is more severe than being tried in a real court and the process is as vindictive, if not more so. You could almost claim Double Jeopardy after being tried in the savage and truculent “Court Of Grace”.

http://nancygraceisanitwit.blogspot.com/

Labels: , , , , , ,

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Is it me...

...or is Nancy Grace an utter and complete whack job? The Maury Povich of cable's prime time talking heads, CNN's helmet headed and confused crusader against all perceived evil people and their families, Grace is as rude as she is stupid."

1. I think I found your problem. Calling media personalities "whack jobs" is no way to win friends and influence people.

2. It is hilarious to read somebody's whines and cries about "censorship" when "Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author." I type this with the rock-solid assurance that this comment will not pass your moderation.

December 16, 2008  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

If the media personality IS a whack job, it's perfectly appropriate to point that fact out. The comment moderation is the result of another whack job, a real cyber stalker dude. I don't like it any more than you do.

Meg

December 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I used to think Bill O’Reilly was the king of jackasses, but I have to agree… Nancy Grace is the worst. At least Bill cuts through the bullshit, but if you lie to him, or dodge the question, you get the beat-down. Nancy just opens her mouth and vomits lies.

I don’t have cable or satellite … is she still on CNN? If so, she fits right in with their lame attempt to report the “news”.

December 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I don’t see any justification for many of George and Cindy Anthony’s actions, but I agree with you about Nancy Grace.

She is a self-righteous, arrogant, judgemental, egotistical, RUDE person.

I hope she doesn’t talk to her family the way she talks to her guests.

December 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with you. You have summed up the way NG is to a tee. Obviously though, if she is broadcasting a show like this and nothing is being done about it, it’s not crossing any lines. If her guests truly felt berated then why don’t they say something to her or get up and leave the interview? They must know she is going to be harsh. The show is all about Nancy, always has been always will be. That’s the way it is. I refuse to name call and pick on people or even let someone like her bother me. I have too many more important things to do in my life right now. My best advise to anyone who doesn’t like her or her showis that there is this device called a remote control or an on/off switch and no one is forced to watch her if they don’t have to.

December 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Personally I think that NG is too soft on the Anthony’s and gives them and their lies and bullshit too much of a break. Even if you have satellite there is still something else to watch than NG if you hate her that much. I hope that everyone of the Anthony’s rot in their own hell that they have created!

December 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The word I believe you are looking for when describing NG’s interview style is “assclown.”

I have a difficult time watching her and Greta. My cure for that is to hit the change channel button.

December 16, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Feedom of speech reigns supreme but there are limits to your diatribe and our freedoms.
Just change the channel and write something someone can comment on.
No matter how much you dislike Nabcy Grace, you are exposing personal hatred where it is unnecessary and uncalled for. We can all agrree to disagree.

Writers are also informing the reader about who they are and what they value. When you sit down at your computer and write for Word Blog you need to remember that it is your responsibility to present the facts without malice.

If Nancy Grace was as bad as you think she is , don’t you think we would all know it?

December 16, 2008  
Blogger Dana said...

Well, I *must* comment because censorship is one of my favorite topics!

First, I can't believe I was considering moving my blog to WordPress. Must nix that fleeting thought.

Second, anonymous commenters irritate me (which is why I no longer allow them on my blog).

And third? Clearly the anonymous commenter has no legal background or they would realize that this post in no way violates the limitations of freedom of speech.

I'm loving your diatribe. It's spot on!

December 16, 2008  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

Thank you! I KNEW that someone would HAVE to see what I was saying!

:)

December 16, 2008  
Blogger Karin's Korner said...

Wow Meg....7 anonymous comments on one blog!! I am impressed...can you hear the sarcasm?? If you can write the words why can't you say who you are?? I don't get it.

Anyway....when is the judge show that you were on going to air??

December 17, 2008  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

A few of them aren't really anonymous, they just don't want that cyber stalker dude to annoy them. I encourage anonymous comments.

I have no clue about the show. I really think that they may very well have pulled it from the schedule because of the blog post where I explained the entire thing. But, if they DO call (they said they would let you know when you'd be on), I assure you, I will shout it on huge letters...in red.

:)

December 17, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home