.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Hi. I'm trying to think of another description to put here. Any ideas? I'll try again at 420.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Proof of time travel


Here you have it folks, proof that time travel is possible. This "woman from the future" is chatting on a cell phone (or scratching her cheek) in this previously discarded clip of film from a Charlie Chaplin movie filmed in 1928. Sadly, this callous wench refused to warn us about Hitler, the JFK assassination and Obamacare, but nevertheless, many believe this to be proof of visitors from the future. Alrighty then.

It would have also been nice if she told us what Obama meant when he said, "We've done things the American people don't even know about." That comment was made on last night's airing of The Daily Show. What a YIKES! moment that was! Just when I think he can't top the last stupid thing he said, he surprises me with a new and improved stupid elucidation. Last night's remark almost made his "Republicans must sit in the back" comment seem innocuous. At least that assertion was outright, but don't you want to know...what the heck IS he doing that we don't know about?

The media has ignored the fact that Obama, the first mulatto President, made that racist "Sit in the back." comment. If Newt Gingrich had said it, he would have been lynched. With all the talk about separation of church and state (a term that is NOT in the US Constitution...neither will you find a right to privacy) it would be nice if we could separate media and state.

Long gone are the days when objective journalists reported the news as it happens. Instead they've been replaced by partisan yahoos who call each other, and the party they do not support, everything but ethical. If you can't see the bias in CNN or FoxNews, simply watch the one you don't usually watch and as you see the demonization of your own party, perhaps you can go back to your own channel with a more critical mind.

By the way, did you know that most, if not all, college curricula do not require a single course in Logic for a degree in Women's Studies? That explains so much.


TO BE FAIR, HERE IS THE OTHER SIDE:

http://diaryofmydivorce.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-answer-to-question-is-time-travel.html

10 Comments:

Anonymous Rod said...

There must have been at least TWO time travelers. That woman must be talking to someone else on her cell.

Who is the other person?

October 29, 2010  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

LOL, we'd have to hear her. If she was saying, "Beam me up Scotty" we'd know there were space travelers from other planets. Maybe she was in that Star Trek episode where Jim and the gang went back to gangster days! Too bad Chaplin's movies were silent.

October 29, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sorry but the woman must be scratching her cheek. To be able to talk to someone else on a mobile, the phones would have to be sending and receiving signals from a sattelite that doesn't exist in the time the photo was taken.
NOT PROOFOF TIME TRAVEL

January 07, 2011  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

Damn...and I thought that we had wrapped up the entire mystery. You, of course, are right.

:(

January 07, 2011  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

OMG! Why didn't I think of the blue tooth ear piece? This time traveler would have had to travel from the 80's to have a phone so large! Duh.

January 07, 2011  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder what wireless company her phone was connecting to? :P

February 10, 2012  
Anonymous June Purcell said...

oh my god i know this a comment on a picture but i think the founder should get an award for being so brave i also have cancer... <3

May 20, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I'm sorry but the woman must be scratching her cheek. To be able to talk to someone else on a mobile, the phones would have to be sending and receiving signals from a sattelite that doesn't exist in the time the photo was taken.
NOT PROOFOF TIME TRAVEL"

Although it's possible that she's just scratching her cheek, but if time travel was to be real in the future, it's not too far to assume that someone has created a relay device that can send directed radio signals to the time she came from.

October 04, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

>1 paragraph about time travel.
>3 paragraphs about Obama.
>Title is "Proof of time travel".

At least make your article about what the title implies it will be about. Silly republican, you have to think before you post. But I suppose anyone with a brain would know Romney will never make a good president.

As for the time travel part, I can't see what's going on in that picture at all. I think it's more likely that she's just scratching her neck.

February 05, 2013  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

First of all, I'm not republican. Secondly, only a nasty human being would go out of their way to leave a nasty comment on a post that's supposed to be funny.

Have a nice day!

February 05, 2013  

Post a Comment

<< Home