.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Hi. I'm trying to think of another description to put here. Any ideas? I'll try again at 420.

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Now THIS is funny


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Meg...didn't want to dig for our last convo..but in case you didn't hear. Your non 'racist' tea party wants to deny you the right to vote.

And anyone else who doesn't own property.

But they're still not racist :)

And good job moving to chicago, you got the bears winning again!!

December 01, 2010  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

I'll read the article in the morning but I had to say, yeah...I singlehandedly got the Bears winning again! Amazing isn't it? The last time I lived here they won the Super Bowl! Now that I said that, of course, they'll lose to the 2&9 Lions but as long as they kick ass when playing Minnesota and Mike "Dog killer" Vick, I'm happy!!!

Who let the dogs out?


December 01, 2010  
Blogger Meg Kelso said...

I read the article and I can't conclude that the Tea Party leader is racist from it. It's a liberal persons' slant on the man's opinion, not his own opinion. I can't use your comment and then use it to make the argument that you must be stupid, and I'm not stupid enough to think that the Tea Party leader dude is racist based on someone elses opinion. Today blacks and women DO own property so I don't see race as an issue when someone says that only those with a vested interest should vote. That is a legitimate argument and race isn't even an issue in it.

If there were 2 lines, one for those who work and one for those who take from those who work, which line would you rather be in? If you were in the line of productive people, would you want all the takers to vote about what YOU give them?

It makes perfect semse to me that the people who are paying into a country should have a voice in what happens to their money. I don't see that as racist.



December 02, 2010  

Post a Comment

<< Home